Why you should hire for skill, not experience
How well does your job define what you do? Job titles govern the structure of work - defining who it’s performed by, and how it’s valued, measured, and compensated. But do job titles help or hinder the hiring process? Recent studies have shown past experience is a poor indicator of candidate fit - because roles no longer accurately describe what we do.
24%
“of workers report they do the same work as others in their organization, even though they have the same exact job title and level” 1
71%
“of workers already perform some work outside of the scope of their job descriptions” 1
81%
“of business executives say work is increasingly performed across functional boundaries” 1
Hiring for skill is a better measure of suitability
According to Forbes2, “hiring based on skills is five times more predictive of future performance than hiring for education and 2.5 times more predictive than hiring for work experience.” Skills and core competencies are much better measures for screening and hiring a candidate than job titles, degree requirements or years of experience.
Top businesses are beginning to look at skills-based hiring models of talent acquisition. Patrick Hull, vice president of future of work at Unilever, believes the new skills-based hiring model can break department silos, refocus how we view employee contributions, and boost business performance by ensuring the right talent is applied to the right tasks and projects1.
What’s to gain from skills-based hiring?
It’s 107% more likely to place talent effectively
It’s five times more predictive of future performance than degree-based hiring
It’s 2.5 times more predictive than hiring for work experience
It levels the playing field and diversifies your talent pool